Urban Challenge Fund: Driving Resilient and Sustainable Indian Cities

  • 0
  • 3025
Font size:
Print

Urban Challenge Fund: Driving Resilient and Sustainable Indian Cities

Urban Challenge Fund: A Bold Path to Stronger Indian Cities

Context: The Urban Challenge Fund reflects India’s urgent push to address rapid urbanisation, outdated infrastructure, and funding gaps in city governance. At a time when cities contribute over 60% to GDP yet face rising climate risks, housing shortages, and service deficits, this performance-linked initiative aims to make urban centres resilient, sustainable, and engines of growth.

What is an Urban Challenge Fund (UCF)? Why is there a need for it?

  • The Urban Challenge Fund (UCF), announced in the Union Budget 2025–26, is a performance-linked funding mechanism with an allocation of ₹1 lakh crore. It aims to support projects in cities as growth hubs, creative redevelopment, and water & sanitation.
  • The need for UCF arises from India’s underinvestment in urban infrastructure. According to the Economic Survey 2023–24, India spent just 0.6% of GDP on urban infrastructure (2011–2018)—far below the required 2–3%. 
  • Meanwhile, urbanisation is accelerating, with the Census 2021 expected to classify over 60% of India’s population as urban by 2036 (NITI Aayog, Transforming India’s Urban Landscape)

Existing schemes like the Smart Cities Mission mobilized innovation but struggled with private sector participation (only 6% projects under PPPs), showing the urgency for a new funding model.

Urban Challenge Fund: Driving Resilient and Sustainable Indian Cities

What are the major issues associated with it?

  • Weak financial capacity of ULBs: Out of 470 municipal corporations, only 36 hold investment-grade credit ratings (Economic Survey 2021–22). This undermines their ability to raise bonds or loans.
  • Past failures of PPPs: Experience from the Smart Cities Mission and Viability Gap Funding scheme shows low investor interest due to bureaucratic hurdles and delayed clearances.
  • Risk of exclusion of Tier-2/3 cities: Bankability focus may sideline smaller cities where urbanization is growing fastest.
  • Underutilisation of funds: Programmes like Swachh Bharat Mission (2024–25) saw drastic budget revisions (₹5,000 cr to ₹2,159 cr), raising concerns about absorptive capacity.

What measures can be taken to address it?

  • Enhance municipal revenues: Improve property tax collection (currently just 0.35% of GDP vs global average of 1%) and rationalise user charges.
  • Credit enhancement mechanisms: Tools like first-loss guarantees and the proposed NaBFID partial credit guarantee fund can reduce risk for private investors.
  • Capacity building of ULBs: Establish dedicated project preparation cells with technical and financial expertise.
  • Focus on innovation & outcomes: Adopt performance-linked frameworks, as seen in Swachh Survekshan rankings, to drive accountability.
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Previous Post Simultaneous Elections and Powers of EC
Next Post Regional Disparity in Industrial Development in India
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x