Tag: Governance

  • Digital Governance in India: A Pathway to Inclusive and Efficient Public Services

    Digital Governance in India: A Pathway to Inclusive and Efficient Public Services

    Introduction – Digital Governance in India

    India, a nation of over 1.4 billion people, faces unique challenges when it comes to governance. With its vast geography, diverse cultures, and varying socio-economic conditions, delivering efficient public services to everyone is a Herculean task. In this context, digital governance, or the use of technology to manage government services and functions, has become a game-changer. Imagine a world where we do not have to stand in long queues to get our certificates, pay utility bills, or file taxes. Instead, all of it can be done online with just a few clicks. This is what digital governance aims to achieve: simplifying processes and ensuring services are accessible to all citizens, no matter where they live.

    The journey of digital governance in India has been exciting but complex. On one hand, it has improved efficiency and transparency, but on the other, it has also exposed challenges like the digital divide and the need for strong cybersecurity. This essay explores the initiatives, benefits, and obstacles of digital governance in India while explaining its impact in a manner that makes even the most difficult terms easy to understand.

     

    Understanding Digital Governance

    To understand digital governance, let us break it down. Governance is the way governments make decisions and deliver services to their people. Now, add digital technology to this process – computers, the internet, apps, and digital platforms – and we get digital governance. For example, instead of visiting a government office to apply for a passport, we can now apply online, track its status, and even receive updates through SMS or email. This not only saves time but also reduces the chances of errors and corruption.

    Digital governance is not just about using fancy gadgets; it is about making government work smarter and faster. It helps officials share information quickly, analyse data to make better decisions, and eliminate unnecessary paperwork. This means citizens can enjoy quicker services, fewer delays, and more transparency in how things are done.

     

    India’s Initiatives to Bridge the Gap Between Citizens and Government

    India has made remarkable progress in implementing digital governance, introducing innovative programmes to modernise its services and make them more efficient. These initiatives showcase a strong commitment to leveraging technology for better governance.

    One notable initiative is the iGOT Karmayogi platform, an online learning tool for government officials. Think of it as a virtual classroom where officers learn skills like data analysis, public administration, and digital technology. Unlike traditional training, it allows flexibility, letting officials learn at their own pace. Whether a junior officer in a remote village or a senior bureaucrat in the capital, everyone gets equal access to improve their skills. This is vital as technology evolves rapidly, requiring government employees to stay updated to serve citizens effectively.

    The e-Office initiative brings a paperless revolution to government offices. Imagine if a school replaces all notebooks with digital devices – that is how this programme works. It digitises files, workflows, and communication, making work faster and more organised. Important documents no longer risk being misplaced, and communication between departments becomes seamless. This initiative ensures better coordination across government bodies, helping them respond to public needs more quickly and efficiently, reducing bureaucratic delays.

    The UMANG app, or Unified Mobile Application for New-Age Governance, acts like a one-stop shop for government services. Whether it is paying electricity bills, applying for scholarships, or lodging complaints, citizens can do it all from their phones. Available 24/7, the app puts a government office in our pocket. This is particularly helpful for people in rural areas who may live far from physical offices, offering them convenience and accessibility like never before.

    Finally, the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) modernises the way the government procures goods and services. Imagine an Amazon-like platform, but exclusively for government purchases. By moving procurement online, GeM ensures fair pricing, eliminates corruption, and streamlines the buying process. This efficiency saves time and resources, allowing government offices to focus on delivering services to citizens. These initiatives demonstrate India’s commitment to leveraging technology for better governance and service delivery.

     

    Benefits of Digital Governance

    Digital governance has transformed how governments function and interact with citizens, making services more efficient, accessible, and transparent. Its impact on people’s lives is both wide-reaching and meaningful.

    One major benefit is accessibility, where citizens can access government services from their homes. Platforms like DigiLocker let students securely store and retrieve mark sheets and certificates online. This eliminates long journeys to government offices, saving time and effort, especially for those in rural areas with limited access to such facilities.

    Another advantage is transparency, which ensures citizens can see how government processes work. For instance, the Public Financial Management System (PFMS) allows people to track government spending, ensuring funds reach the intended beneficiaries. This openness reduces corruption by making shady practices harder to hide, fostering trust between the government and its citizens.

    Digital governance also boosts efficiency, speeding up processes that traditionally took weeks. Imagine how quickly homework gets done with a computer compared to writing by hand. Similarly, platforms like e-Courts allow legal cases to be resolved much faster, ensuring timely justice and reducing backlogs in the system.

    Lastly, digital governance promotes inclusivity, ensuring that even marginalised groups benefit from public services. Initiatives like the Jan Dhan Yojana, which connects bank accounts with mobile technology, enable subsidies and pensions to be transferred directly to people’s accounts. This reduces reliance on intermediaries, ensuring everyone gets what they are entitled to without unnecessary delays or complications.

     

    Challenges: Roadblocks to Progress

    Digital governance has made impressive strides in India, but several challenges still hinder its full potential. These roadblocks must be addressed for true progress.

    One major issue is the digital divide, the gap between those who have access to technology and those who do not. In many rural areas, reliable internet connections and affordable devices remain out of reach. Without these, people cannot benefit from digital services. Initiatives like BharatNet, aiming to bring broadband to every village, offer hope to bridge this gap and create equal opportunities for all.

    Another challenge is digital literacy, or the ability to use technology effectively. Many people, such as elderly individuals or those unfamiliar with smartphones, find it hard to navigate apps and websites. This can exclude them from using essential services. Organising workshops and training sessions can teach these skills, making digital governance more inclusive and accessible to everyone.

    Cybersecurity also poses a serious threat as more government services go online. Imagine if sensitive information, such as our Aadhaar number or bank details, fell into the wrong hands through hacking. To prevent this, the government must build strong security systems and train employees to detect and handle cyber threats. This ensures public trust and safety in the digital space.

    Lastly, there is resistance to change among some government employees who are accustomed to traditional ways of working. They may hesitate to adopt new technologies. Providing proper training and offering incentives can encourage them to embrace digital tools, ensuring smoother transitions and better service delivery for citizens.

     

    Blending Ancient Wisdom with Modern Technology

    India’s digital governance approach goes beyond adopting new technology; it integrates ancient governance principles for a balanced strategy. Chanakya, a renowned Indian philosopher, advocated ethical leadership and efficient decision-making, ideas still relevant today. By blending these timeless values with cutting-edge technology, India creates digital initiatives that are not only innovative but also ethically sound, ensuring progress that respects tradition while meeting modern needs.

     

    Future of Digital Governance

    The journey of digital governance in India is still evolving, and there is much to be done to make it even better. One key step is ensuring that government employees receive regular training to stay updated with the latest technology. This will help them work more efficiently and provide better services to the people, keeping up with modern needs.

    Another important focus is expanding digital infrastructure so that even villages and small towns have access to high-speed internet and affordable devices like smartphones. This ensures that everyone, no matter where they live, can benefit from digital governance. It is like building better roads for everyone, but in this case, the “roads” are internet connections.

    Finally, strengthening cybersecurity is vital to protect sensitive information and maintain trust in digital systems. Encouraging innovation, or coming up with new and creative solutions, will also help tackle challenges and improve governance. By addressing these areas, India can create a strong, inclusive digital future for all its citizens.

     

    Conclusion

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”gle960b9kb” question=”Is this helpful ? ” opened=”0″]

    Digital governance is transforming India’s public service delivery, making it more efficient, transparent, and accessible. While challenges like the digital divide and cybersecurity need to be addressed, the country’s initiatives, such as iGOT Karmayogi and UMANG, are paving the way for a brighter future. By combining modern technology with ethical values, India is setting an example for the world. As this journey continues, it reminds us that governance is not just about technology – it is about people and their trust in the system. With collective efforts, India can create a governance model that leaves no one behind, truly empowering its citizens in the digital age.

    [/wpdiscuz-feedback]

    Subscribe to our Youtube Channel for more Valuable Content – TheStudyias

    Download the App to Subscribe to our Courses – Thestudyias

    The Source’s Authority and Ownership of the Article is Claimed By THE STUDY IAS BY MANIKANT SINGH

  • A Heated Assembly Debate: The Struggle Over Article 370 Restoration in Jammu and Kashmir

    A Heated Assembly Debate: The Struggle Over Article 370 Restoration in Jammu and Kashmir

    The Struggle Over Restoration of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir.

    On November 7, 2024, a fierce dispute erupted in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, capturing the attention of the public and reflecting the region’s ongoing struggle for political identity and autonomy. The altercation began when Sheikh Khursheed, brother of Member of Parliament Engineer Rashid, displayed a banner demanding the restoration of Article 370 and the release of political prisoners. This bold act led to a physical clash involving members from different political parties, each with varying views on the future of Jammu and Kashmir. The heated environment within the Assembly underscored the complexity of the issues surrounding Article 370, a provision that once granted special autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir, and the significant challenges that lie ahead in addressing these demands.

     

    What is Article 370?

    Article 370 of the Indian Constitution was introduced to provide special status to Jammu and Kashmir. This unique status allowed the state to have its own constitution, separate laws, and a considerable degree of autonomy, particularly in matters related to residency, property ownership, and government employment. This arrangement was meant to recognise Jammu and Kashmir’s distinct identity and safeguard its political autonomy while keeping it within the Indian Union. However, on August 5, 2019, this special status was abrogated by the Indian government, effectively removing the state’s autonomy and reorganising it into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, with a legislative assembly, and Ladakh, without one​​.

    The Struggle Over Article 370 Restoration in Jammu and Kashmir.

    The Controversy and Call for Restoration

    The decision to revoke Article 370 sparked intense political and emotional reactions across Jammu and Kashmir. Many residents and political leaders saw the removal of Article 370 as a loss of identity and autonomy, stirring feelings of resentment and a sense of betrayal. Political parties in Jammu and Kashmir, such as the National Conference (NC) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), along with independent legislators like Engineer Rashid and his supporters, have continuously voiced their opposition to this change. They argue that the special status was an essential part of Jammu and Kashmir’s unique identity within the Indian Union and that its removal has left the region without adequate representation or protection for its distinct culture​​.

     

    The Assembly Scuffle: A Reflection of Political Division

    The recent scuffle in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly is a physical manifestation of the divided opinions on this issue. During the Assembly session, Sheikh Khursheed’s act of displaying a banner calling for the restoration of Article 370 was met with hostility from members of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), who view the abrogation as a positive step towards integrating Jammu and Kashmir fully into India. When BJP members tried to seize the banner, other legislators, including Sajad Lone and Waheed Para, came to Khursheed’s support, leading to a confrontation that required the intervention of security personnel and resulted in the expulsion of three MLAs from the Assembly hall. This incident highlights the strong emotions tied to the issue of Article 370 and the difficulty in reaching a consensus on the region’s political future​.

     

    The Legal Challenges to Restoring Article 370

    Restoring Article 370 is not merely a matter of political will; it involves significant legal and constitutional obstacles. According to the Supreme Court of India, Article 370 was originally intended as a temporary provision, and its abrogation was seen as a final step in integrating Jammu and Kashmir into India. The Court upheld the government’s decision in 2019, stating that the removal of Article 370 aligned with the constitutional goal of integrating the region. This decision established a strong legal precedent, making it highly unlikely for future courts to reverse the ruling. Additionally, any attempt to restore Article 370 would require a constitutional amendment, demanding a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament—an extremely difficult achievement in India’s current political landscape​​​.

     

    Political Reality and the Promise of Statehood

    In recent years, there has been a shift in focus from restoring Article 370 to regaining statehood for Jammu and Kashmir. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah have expressed their commitment to restoring Jammu and Kashmir’s status as a state, though without the special autonomy previously provided under Article 370. This shift reflects the political reality that restoring Article 370 may not be achievable in the foreseeable future. Many political leaders, including Ghulam Nabi Azad, have urged people to focus on development and progress rather than on promises of autonomy that may be difficult to fulfil​.

     

    Changing Public Sentiment and Priorities

    The demand for the restoration of Article 370 continues to hold emotional significance for many people in Jammu and Kashmir. However, public sentiment has also started to shift toward other priorities, such as development, employment, and infrastructure. The abrogation of Article 370 has been framed by the government as a step toward long-term stability and integration, leading to changes in how people view the region’s future. For some, the focus has turned to practical concerns, such as improving living conditions and economic opportunities, while others continue to advocate for political autonomy. This division in priorities reflects the complex and evolving attitudes toward the issue of Article 370 within Jammu and Kashmir and across India​.

     

    The Political Strategy and False Hope

    The ongoing promises by local parties to restore Article 370 have also been criticised as a political strategy to gain support in elections. By appealing to voters’ emotions, some political leaders are accused of creating a false sense of hope among the people of Jammu and Kashmir. While these promises resonate with those who feel a strong connection to the region’s unique identity, they are often seen as unrealistic given the significant legal and political obstacles. Critics argue that focusing on more achievable goals, such as the restoration of statehood and improving local governance, would better serve the people of Jammu and Kashmir than making promises that are unlikely to be fulfilled​.

     

    Conclusion

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”gm9per2fh6″ question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”0″]

    The scuffle in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly over the display of a banner calling for the restoration of Article 370 reflects the intense emotions and deep-seated political tensions surrounding this issue. The abrogation of Article 370 remains a divisive topic, with strong opinions on both sides. However, the path to restoring it is fraught with legal, political, and constitutional challenges that make it highly unlikely in the current environment. As public sentiment shifts and priorities evolve, the focus in Jammu and Kashmir may increasingly turn to more achievable goals, such as restoring statehood and promoting development. This incident in the Assembly serves as a reminder of the complexity of the issues at hand and the ongoing struggle for a solution that respects the region’s identity while aligning with national interests.

    The recent Assembly scuffle encapsulates the broader struggle within Jammu and Kashmir as it grapples with questions of identity, autonomy, and progress. While the restoration of Article 370 remains an aspiration for some, the realities of Indian politics and the legal hurdles involved suggest that this dream may be out of reach. Moving forward, a focus on statehood and development may offer a more practical path to addressing the needs and aspirations of the people in this historically significant region.

    [/wpdiscuz-feedback]

    (more…)

  • Understanding Digital Arrest Scams: Protecting Oneself from Cyber Fraud

    Understanding Digital Arrest Scams: Protecting Oneself from Cyber Fraud

    Introduction – Understanding Digital Arrest Scams

    This essay, based on the news story “PM Modi Cautions Against ‘Digital Arrest’ Scams: What They Are, How to Stay Safe” from The Indian Express (October 27, 2024), explains how digital arrest scams have become a big problem in India. In these scams, cybercriminals pretend to be police or officials to scare and trick people into paying money. Many of these scammers are from Southeast Asia and use clever tricks to fool people. It’s important for everyone to understand how these scams work, listen to government advice, and learn ways to protect themselves from being tricked.

     

    In recent years, Digital Arrest Scams (Cyber scams) have increased rapidly, especially in India, as scammers find new ways to deceive people online. One of the most concerning types of cybercrime is the “digital arrest” scam, where criminals pretend to be law enforcement officers to scare and exploit victims for money. In this scam, victims receive calls from individuals claiming to be police or government officials, informing them that they are involved in illegal activities and must pay money to avoid arrest. Many victims have lost significant amounts of money because of these scams. This essay discusses the definition of a digital arrest scam, how it works, the impact it has had in India, and the steps individuals can take to protect themselves.

    Digital Arrest Scams.

    What is a Digital Arrest Scam?

    The term “digital arrest” refers to a cybercrime tactic in which scammers impersonate law enforcement officers to falsely accuse individuals of crimes. This type of scam is particularly effective because it preys on people’s fear of legal trouble. The scam begins when a victim receives a phone or video call from someone pretending to be a police officer, customs official, or government agent. The caller might say that a package containing illegal items—such as drugs or fake documents—has been linked to the victim. The scammers then claim that an arrest warrant has been issued, adding a layer of pressure and urgency.

    To make their impersonation convincing, scammers often dress in uniforms, use fake IDs, and set up backgrounds that resemble police stations or government offices. Victims are told they are under a “digital arrest,” which means they must stay online with the scammer, often through a video call, until they “clear their name” by paying a fine or fee. However, there is no legal concept of digital arrest under Indian law, and no government agency would make an arrest over the phone or internet​​.

     

    Prime Minister Modi’s Advice on Digital Arrest Scams

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi has addressed the issue of digital arrest scams in his radio program, Mann Ki Baat (October 27, 2028), urging citizens to stay alert. He explained that there is no system of digital arrest in India and warned that scammers use fear and intimidation to create panic. He advised everyone to follow three simple steps when faced with suspicious calls: stop, think, and take action.

    1. Stop: Remain calm and do not panic when receiving such calls. Scammers thrive on making people feel afraid, so staying composed is the first step in preventing the scam from escalating.
    2. Think: Remember that no government official will threaten or arrest someone online. Government agencies, especially those responsible for law enforcement, do not conduct investigations or arrests through phone or video calls. Any such communication is likely fraudulent.
    3. Take Action: Report suspicious calls immediately. Prime Minister Modi encouraged citizens to contact the National Cybercrime Helpline (1930) or visit the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Reporting suspicious activities not only helps protect the individual but also aids authorities in tracking these scams and preventing future incidents​.

     

    How it Works:

    Digital arrest scams are elaborate and often very convincing. Scammers contact victims through phone calls or video calls on platforms like WhatsApp and Skype. They introduce themselves as police officers or officials from agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or customs officials. To make their claims appear legitimate, these scammers often dress in uniforms, create fake IDs, and use backgrounds that look like police stations​​.

    The scammers then tell the victim they are linked to some serious crime, such as possessing illegal drugs or fake documents, and threaten them with arrest. In one case, a senior official from the National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) was tricked into believing she was wanted for sending illegal items like fake passports and drugs. She was forced to pay large sums to “clear her name” but later discovered it was all a scam​. Such stories show how scammers target people’s fear of the law to get what they want.

     

    Why Digital Arrest Scams Are So Effective

    Digital arrest scams are successful because they use fear and confusion to manipulate people. When someone is told they are part of a crime, they often feel panicked and cannot think clearly. The scammers take advantage of this fear by insisting that the victim must pay quickly to avoid trouble. They might even keep the victim on a video call for hours, telling them not to talk to anyone else or to stay online until they pay the money. This tactic, known as “digital custody,” isolates the victim and prevents them from getting advice or help​.

    Scammers also use fake documents, legal jargon, and even create pretend court hearings to make their demands appear more genuine. For example, some scammers organised a fake court hearing over Skype, where one person pretended to be the Chief Justice of India. This level of detail makes it hard for victims to recognise that it is a scam​.

     

    Key Regions Involved in Digital Arrest Scams

    Most digital arrest scams affecting Indians come from neighbouring Southeast Asian countries. Criminal groups based in Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia are behind many of these scams. These countries have weak enforcement laws, which allow scam networks to grow without much intervention from local authorities​. Moreover, the scammers often use social media platforms to lure people by offering fake jobs or financial opportunities. They sometimes even advertise in regional languages, making it easier for them to connect with Indian citizens.

    This international aspect of digital arrest scams makes it harder for Indian authorities to track and stop these criminals. Despite international boundaries, the Indian government has tried to cooperate with law enforcement agencies from these countries to control cyber fraud. However, it remains a challenging task due to differences in legal systems and the growing number of scammers.

     

    Types of Digital Frauds Related to Digital Arrest Scams

    Digital arrest scams are one of several types of cybercrimes impacting Indians. Other similar scams include trading scams, task-based investment scams, and romance scams.

    1. Trading Scams: Scammers promise victims huge returns on their investments in fake trading platforms. Victims are persuaded to put money into “investment accounts” that seem to grow over time. However, when they try to withdraw their earnings, they find out that the profits were fake. This scam has cost Indians around ₹1,420 crore in the first quarter of 2024​.
    2. Task-Based Investment Scams: In this scam, victims receive offers of work from home, with the promise of easy money. They are asked to rate businesses or perform online tasks for a small payment. After gaining the victim’s trust, scammers ask for a “deposit” to start bigger tasks, but the victims never see this money again. Indians lost over ₹222 crore to this scam in early 2024​.
    3. Romance Scams: These scams prey on people seeking relationships. Victims are targeted by scammers who pose as romantic partners. After building a fake relationship, the scammer asks for money, often claiming to need help in an emergency. Although less common, romance scams have caused losses of ₹13 crore​.

    Each of these scams uses deception to trick victims, creating financial and emotional damage. Digital arrest scams are only one type in a growing web of online crimes.

     

    How to Protect Yourself from Digital Arrest Scams

    Protecting oneself from digital arrest scams requires awareness and caution. Here are some key ways people can protect themselves:

    1. Stay Informed: Understanding how these scams work is the first step in avoiding them. Prime Minister Modi recently urged people to recognise that no government official would make an arrest through a phone call or video call. He also stressed that there is no legal concept like “digital arrest”​.
    2. Do Not Panic: Scammers use fear to control their victims. Staying calm is essential to avoid falling into their trap. The government advises that anyone who receives such calls should avoid making quick decisions. Instead, they should take time to think and verify any information provided by the caller.
    3. Report Suspicious Activity: If someone receives a suspicious call, they should immediately report it to the authorities. In India, the National Cybercrime Helpline (1930) and the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal are useful resources for reporting scams. Reporting helps authorities track scam activities and protect others​.
    4. Do Not Share Personal Information: Scammers often ask for sensitive details like Aadhar or PAN card numbers to sound more legitimate. It is essential never to share such information over a call or video chat with unknown people.
    5. Verify Identities: Legitimate law enforcement agencies do not ask for money over the phone. If someone claims to be an official, individuals can verify their identity by contacting the actual agency directly before taking any action.

     

    Conclusion

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”rg62cht49j” question=”Is this helpful ? ” opened=”0″]

    Digital arrest scams reveal the vulnerability of individuals in the digital world, where cybercriminals manipulate fear to exploit people financially. These scams, which often involve fake law enforcement identities and false accusations of crimes, have caused substantial financial losses in India and continue to originate from Southeast Asia. Prime Minister Modi’s advice highlights the importance of awareness and calmness in such situations, encouraging people to “stop, think, and take action.” Recognising these scams and understanding that no legitimate government official would demand money over the phone can significantly reduce risks. By staying informed, reporting suspicious calls, and verifying identities, individuals can safeguard themselves against digital arrest scams. Ultimately, increased public awareness, government measures, and personal caution are key to creating a safer online environment for everyone.

    [/wpdiscuz-feedback]

    (more…)

  • The Manipur Crisis: Reconciliation Through Constitutional Multiculturalism

    The Manipur Crisis: Reconciliation Through Constitutional Multiculturalism

    The Manipur Crisis:

    This essay, based on the article “The Manipur Crisis, the Issue of Managing Diversity” by Dheeraj Murthy and Faizan Mustafa in The Hindu (October 24, 2024), explains that the crisis in Manipur comes from ethnic tensions between the Meitei, Naga, and Kuki communities. It highlights the challenges of managing diversity and suggests that the solution lies in giving more autonomy, encouraging inclusive dialogue, and promoting fair governance to bring peace

    Introduction

    Manipur, a small but ethnically diverse state in northeastern India, has long faced tensions because of its complex demographic makeup. These tensions, which mainly involve the Meitei population and the Naga and Kuki tribes, have escalated into a serious crisis. The conflict highlights deeper issues related to India’s struggle in managing its vast cultural, linguistic, and ethnic diversity. India’s Constitution, designed to protect minority rights and promote unity, is being put to the test. The situation in Manipur points to both the strengths and limitations of the constitutional framework when addressing identity-based conflicts, showing the challenges India faces in keeping peace in a multicultural society​​.

    Manipur Crisis ,

    Ethnic Diversity and the Roots of the Manipur Crisis

    Manipur is home to different ethnic groups, primarily the Meiteis, who are mostly Hindu and live in the valley, and the Naga and Kuki tribes, who are mainly Christian and live in the hills. This clear division between the valley and the hills has been a source of tension for many years. Both sides have different interests, competing over land, political power, and protecting their way of life.

    Recently, the Meitei community has demanded Scheduled Tribe (ST) status, which would give them the right to own land in the hill areas, traditionally reserved for the Naga and Kuki tribes. This has created a serious conflict, as the hill tribes view this demand as a direct threat to their land and cultural identity. The deepening divide between these groups is making it harder for peace to be restored​​.

     

    Constitutional Provisions and Diversity Management

    The Indian Constitution is known for accommodating the country’s diversity through special provisions for different states and regions, including those with unique ethnic challenges. Article 371C was introduced specifically for Manipur. It provides for the formation of a Hill Area Committee, made up of elected representatives from the hill areas. The committee’s job is to address the concerns of the tribal population in these regions. However, the Hill Area Committee has very limited decision-making power, and this has made it difficult to fully address the needs of the hill tribes​.

    Other states, like Tripura, have successfully used the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution to grant more autonomy to tribal areas. This includes giving them control over education, land, and resource management. In contrast, Manipur has no such strong provisions, and this has led to the ongoing tensions. The tribal populations feel that their autonomy and rights are not adequately protected by the existing constitutional framework​.

     

    The Limits of Constitutional Solutions in Manipur

    Although India’s Constitution provides mechanisms to manage diversity, the Manipur crisis exposes some of its limitations. For example, Article 355, which allows the central government to intervene in states facing internal disturbances, was invoked as the crisis escalated. This shows that the state-level governance in Manipur has broken down, and the existing constitutional provisions have not been enough to prevent or resolve the conflict​.

    The Hill Area Committee, established under Article 371C, has failed to provide the hill tribes with real autonomy. Unlike states such as Tripura, where amendments to the Constitution have granted greater representation and autonomy to tribal communities, the tribes in Manipur feel left out of the political process. This exclusion has increased their resentment and fear of domination by the Meitei majority, worsening the ethnic divisions​.

     

    Case Studies: Sikkim and Tripura as Models of Accommodation

    The experiences of Sikkim and Tripura offer valuable lessons for dealing with the crisis in Manipur. In Sikkim, Article 371F was added to the Constitution to protect the identity of the Bhutia-Lepcha community. This was done through reserved political representation and the protection of their cultural autonomy. The Supreme Court upheld these provisions, recognising that group identities are crucial for maintaining political stability​.

    Similarly, Tripura provides another example of how constitutional provisions can help manage ethnic diversity. The Tripura Accord extended the Sixth Schedule to the state, giving greater autonomy to tribal areas. This move reduced violence and promoted political inclusion for the tribal population. In both Sikkim and Tripura, constitutional measures were used to protect ethnic identities and share power, leading to greater peace and stability. However, Manipur lacks such strong safeguards, which is one reason the crisis has escalated​.

     

    The Role of Federalism and Autonomy in Managing Diversity

    Federalism, which divides power between the central government and the states, is a key part of India’s strategy for managing its vast diversity. The Constitution allows for special provisions tailored to the needs of different regions, like Nagaland, Assam, and Sikkim. These provisions have helped maintain peace by giving different ethnic groups a degree of autonomy. However, in the case of Manipur, these provisions have not been strong enough. While Article 371C grants some autonomy to the hill areas, it does not provide the same level of protection and self-governance that is found in the Sixth Schedule, which applies to other northeastern states. The demand for greater autonomy by the hill tribes in Manipur reflects the need for more inclusive governance. The exclusion of tribal voices from key decision-making processes has fuelled resentment and worsened ethnic tensions​​.

     

    Reconciliation Through Constitutional Evolution

    The Supreme Court’s ruling in R.C. Poudyal (1993) offers important insights into how the Constitution can help reconcile competing identities. The Court recognised that, in some cases, “accommodations and adjustments” are necessary to help different ethnic groups live together peacefully. This flexible approach is especially important in a diverse state like Manipur, where rigid application of constitutional provisions has failed to address the unique challenges created by ethnic diversity​.

    To resolve the crisis in Manipur, it is essential to revisit the constitutional framework that governs the state. Extending the Sixth Schedule to Manipur or strengthening Article 371C could give the hill tribes the autonomy they need, while also protecting their cultural and political rights. Power-sharing arrangements that include all ethnic groups in the governance of the state would also help to ease tensions and promote long-term peace​​.

     

    Conclusion: Evolving Solutions for a Pluralistic Society

    The Manipur crisis highlights the difficulties of managing diversity in a pluralistic society like India. While the Indian Constitution provides a strong framework for protecting minority rights, it has not been fully effective in resolving the deep-seated tensions in Manipur. The examples of Sikkim and Tripura show that constitutional pragmatism—allowing for power-sharing and political autonomy—can be effective in managing ethnic diversity and preventing conflict​.

    To resolve the crisis in Manipur, it is essential to focus on dialogue and negotiation. This includes granting greater autonomy to the hill tribes and ensuring that all ethnic groups have a say in the governance of the state. The Indian Constitution, as a living document, has the capacity to evolve and adapt to the unique challenges posed by the diversity in Manipur. By embracing the principles of accommodation and inclusivity, a peaceful solution can be found that respects the rights and identities of all communities​.

     

    Final Thoughts and Recommendations

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”33ir9kmvm7″ question=”Is this helpful ? ” opened=”0″]The situation in Manipur calls for urgent action. While constitutional provisions have played a role in managing diversity in other regions of India, more must be done to address the specific needs of Manipur’s ethnic groups. Expanding the Sixth Schedule’s provisions or reforming Article 371C could give the hill tribes the protection and autonomy they need, while helping the Meiteis and other groups feel secure in their rights. In the long term, this would reduce the likelihood of future conflict. Moreover, the central government must work with local leaders to create platforms for dialogue and negotiation, ensuring that all voices are heard and considered in decision-making. Only by working together can Manipur’s diverse communities move toward lasting peace and stability​​.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

    (more…)

  • From Tragedy to Triumph: Governing the Commons from the Bottom-Up

    From Tragedy to Triumph: Governing the Commons from the Bottom-Up

    Inspired by Amitabh Sinha’s article titled “Why Commons Matter, How Community is Key to Their Well-being” in “E. Explained” section of The Indian Express (Monday, September 16, 2024), this essay refers to the “tragedy of the commons” to merely highlight the risk of resource depletion due to self-interest; it, instead, endorses Elinor Ostrom’s research which shows that communities can manage shared resources sustainably through cooperation and bottom-up governance. This essay also explores global and Indian examples, including India’s vast commons, offering insights into successful community-led resource management and policy reforms for sustainable governance.

     

    The concept of the commons refers to resources shared by a community and accessible to all its members. These resources range from natural elements like land, air, and water to social and cultural assets, such as knowledge and public spaces. The idea of the commons has expanded over time to include digital spaces and other shared goods crucial for societal functioning. However, the governance of commons has historically been fraught with challenges, leading to concerns about overuse and depletion—a concept famously referred to as the “tragedy of the commons.” The tragedy of the commons, introduced by Garrett Hardin in 1968, suggests that individuals, acting in their self-interest, will inevitably exploit shared resources, resulting in their destruction. Despite the widespread acceptance of this theory, scholars like Elinor Ostrom have challenged its premise, showing that communities, through cooperation and bottom-up governance, can effectively manage and sustain their commons. This essay explores the evolution from the tragedy to the triumph of governing commons, focusing on successful community-based models and the lessons learned from India’s experience in managing its vast commons.

     

    Understanding the Commons

    Commons are resources that benefit everyone and are collectively managed by the communities that rely on them. Donald M. Nonini explains that the commons, ranging from natural resources like land and water to shared knowledge, are essential for human survival and societal well-being​. Traditionally, the commons referred to rural resources such as forests and grazing lands, but this idea has since expanded to include urban spaces, digital knowledge, and global commons like the atmosphere.

    Elinor Ostrom, a Nobel Prize-winning political scientist, demonstrated that the tragedy of the commons is not inevitable. In her seminal work Governing the Commons, Ostrom provided evidence that communities can effectively govern shared resources through systems of rules and institutions developed from within, rather than imposed from above​. Her work counters the notion that only top-down governance by the state or privatization can prevent resource depletion.

     

    The Tragedy of the Commons

    Garrett Hardin’s concept of the tragedy of the commons posits that when individuals act solely in their self-interest, they will overuse and deplete shared resources, leading to their eventual collapse. Hardin used the example of communal grazing lands, where each farmer, seeking to maximize personal benefit, adds more livestock, eventually leading to overgrazing and destruction of the land​.

    While Hardin’s theory highlighted a real concern about the potential for overuse of commons, it failed to account for the capacity of communities to self-organize and govern these resources sustainably. Across the world, communities have developed sophisticated systems of managing commons for generations without the need for external oversight​.

     

    Elinor Ostrom and the Triumph of the Commons

    Elinor Ostrom’s work provided a powerful rebuttal to Hardin’s theory. Through extensive fieldwork, she demonstrated that communities could, under the right conditions, govern their commons without depleting them​. Ostrom’s research highlighted the success of communities that have established systems of rules to regulate resource use, monitor compliance, and resolve conflicts. These systems are often more effective than top-down government interventions, which may be disconnected from the local context.

    A critical element in Ostrom’s model is “conditional cooperation”—the idea that individuals are willing to cooperate as long as others do the same​. In communities where cooperation is prevalent, resources are often managed sustainably through locally developed rules and enforcement mechanisms. For example, in Ethiopia, forest communities with a higher proportion of conditional cooperators successfully managed their forest commons through collective patrols and resource monitoring​.

     

    Bottom-Up Governance in Practice

    The core of Ostrom’s argument is that bottom-up governance, where local communities take responsibility for managing their resources, is a highly effective model for sustaining the commons. In bottom-up governance, the people who use and depend on the resources are responsible for creating and enforcing the rules that govern their use. This model relies on trust, cooperation, and local knowledge​.

    For example, decentralized management of irrigation systems in Nepal, where local farmers were allowed to develop rules suited to their specific needs, proved more effective than government-controlled systems​. Such community-based governance allows for greater flexibility and responsiveness, as local actors are better positioned to adapt to the complexities and changes within their environments.

    However, bottom-up governance is not without its challenges. Scaling this model to manage larger or global commons, such as climate change or ocean fisheries, requires cooperation on a much larger scale. Nevertheless, the principles of cooperation, trust, and collective action that underpin successful local commons governance can also be applied to these global challenges, provided there is a commitment to fostering collaboration across borders​.

     

    The Commons in India: A Critical Resource

    India’s commons are an essential part of the rural landscape, providing vital resources and services to millions of people. Comprising approximately 205 million acres of land, India’s commons include community forests, grazing pastures, and water bodies, which serve as a lifeline for around 350 million rural inhabitants​. For these communities, the commons offer critical resources like fuelwood, fodder, and water, and serve as a buffer during times of environmental stress, such as droughts. The commons also play an important role in maintaining ecological balance, contributing to water retention, flood control, soil conservation, and biodiversity preservation.

    In economic terms, the value generated by India’s commons is significant. These shared resources are estimated to contribute approximately ₹6.6 lakh crore annually to the rural economy through the provision of goods and ecological services​. However, the value of the commons goes beyond economics. These resources are deeply embedded in the social and cultural fabric of rural India, offering a strong connection between communities and the land they rely on for sustenance.

     

    Challenges Facing India’s Commons

    Despite their importance, India’s commons are under increasing pressure from urbanization, industrialization, and privatization. As more land is diverted for commercial purposes, rural communities are losing access to the commons that have sustained them for generations. Overgrazing, deforestation, and unsustainable extraction practices have further degraded these resources, making it harder for communities to derive their livelihoods from them​.

    Additionally, many of India’s commons are not formally recognized by legal frameworks, leaving them vulnerable to encroachment by private interests or government projects. Without clear legal protections, communities face difficulties in safeguarding these critical resources​. However, there has been a growing recognition of the need to regenerate and conserve India’s commons, and several initiatives have been launched to restore degraded lands and promote sustainable management practices.

     

    The Conference on India’s Commons: A Step Towards Solutions

    From 12-14 August in 2024, a national conference on “Regenerating India’s Commons” was held in New Delhi, bringing together policymakers, researchers, community leaders, and environmentalists to discuss the challenges facing India’s commons and explore strategies for their protection and revitalization​. The conference highlighted the need for comprehensive policy reforms, community participation, and collaborative efforts to ensure the sustainability of these shared resources.

    One of the key themes of the conference was the role of commons in climate resilience. As climate change impacts rainfall patterns, agriculture, and ecosystems across India, the commons are becoming increasingly important as buffers against environmental shocks. They provide vital services such as water recharge, flood mitigation, and drought resilience—services that are particularly crucial for rural areas vulnerable to climate-induced disasters​.

    Case studies presented at the conference demonstrated the success of community-led initiatives in managing and regenerating commons. One such example from Rajasthan showcased how local communities had restored traditional water bodies known as johads, small earthen dams used for water harvesting. These efforts helped recharge groundwater, rejuvenated local agriculture, and improved livelihoods in water-scarce regions​.

     

    Policy Recommendations for India’s Commons

    The conference led to several important policy recommendations aimed at improving the governance of India’s commons. First, there was a call for legal recognition and protection of commons, to give communities the power to manage and sustainably use these resources​. Second, the conference emphasized the need for community-based governance models, inspired by successful examples of local resource management. These models would allow communities to take ownership of decision-making processes, supported by state institutions to enforce sustainable practices.

    Furthermore, large-scale restoration and regeneration programs were recommended to revive degraded commons. This includes reforestation efforts, soil conservation, and the restoration of traditional water systems. The participants also stressed the importance of integrating commons management into India’s broader climate adaptation strategies​. Lastly, inclusive development policies were urged, ensuring that marginalized groups, including women and smallholder farmers, benefit from the protection and sustainable management of commons​.

     

    Conclusion: From Tragedy to Triumph

    The tragedy of the commons is not an inevitable outcome. As Elinor Ostrom’s research and India’s experience have shown, communities have the capacity to manage their commons sustainably through cooperation and bottom-up governance. By empowering local communities, fostering trust, and supporting decentralized decision-making, we can move from tragedy to triumph in the governance of shared resources.

    India’s commons, which provide vital resources and ecological services to millions of people, are under threat from commercialization and environmental degradation. However, through collective action, policy reforms, and community-led initiatives, there is hope for regenerating these critical resources and ensuring their long-term sustainability. The success of India’s commons will depend on the collaboration between communities, governments, and civil society, working together to protect these vital shared assets for future generations.

  • Grievances of Citizens Being Addressed by CPGRAMS Portal

    Context: Recently, the Union Minister stated that Grievances of Citizens from even the remotest part of the country are being addressed by The Centralised Public Grievances Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS)  portal within a time bound manner.

     

    Overview of CPGRAMS Portal:

    • CPGRAMS is an online platform available 24×7 for citizens to lodge grievances related to service delivery. 
    • Launched in 2007
      •  Under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances.
    • Purpose: Facilitates online grievance redress by forwarding grievances from citizens to Central Government Ministries, Departments, Organizations and State Governments.
    • The system is also accessible through a standalone mobile application on the Google Play Store and integrated with UMANG.
    • Collaboration with Common Service Centres (CSCs) aids rural residents in filing grievances on CPGRAMS.
    • Grievances can also be submitted through post or mail.
    • Feedback and Support:
      • A 50-seater Feedback Call Centre operates in 10 regional languages, including Odia, as well as Hindi and English.
      • The Call Centre provides feedback on grievance resolutions and helps citizens file appeals if they are dissatisfied.
    • National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP):
      • Provides ₹300 per month to widows aged 40-79 years and ₹500 per month to those aged 80 years and above.
    • Special Campaign for Widows’ Pension:
      • A month-long campaign from 1st July 2024 aimed at redressing Family Pension grievances, particularly benefiting widows.
      • 1140 Family Pension cases have been resolved during this campaign.
    • Issues not taken up for redress include RTI matters, court-related/sub judice matters, religious matters, suggestions, and grievances of government employees concerning their service matters, including disciplinary proceedings.

     

  • Khelo India Scheme

    Context:

    The Khelo India Scheme has allocated funds to various states and union territories for sports infrastructure development.

     

    About Scheme:

    • The Khelo India Scheme, launched in 2016, addressed previous anomalies in the sports sector.
    • It is a flagship initiative by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports aimed at promoting sports culture and achieving sporting excellence across India
    • From 2017 to 2020, three editions of the Khelo India School and Youth Games and one edition of the Khelo India University Games were hosted.
    • More than 23 lakh school children in the age group of 5-18 years have been assessed through Khelo India mobile app

    Khelo India scheme

     

    Objectives:

    • Playfield Development: The scheme focuses on creating and upgrading playfields (serves as the foundation for nurturing young talent and encouraging active participation in sports) across the country.
    • Utilisation and Creation/Upgradation of Sports Infrastructure: It allocates funds for critical gaps including building state-of-the-art facilities, sports hubs, and centres of excellence in select universities.

     

    Significance:

    • Sports for Peace and Development: It encourages sports activities in areas affected by extremism and terrorism (in the State of Jammu & Kashmir and Left Wing Extremism (LWE) affected States).
    • Talent Search and Development: Khelo India identifies promising athletes and provides them with training, coaching, and support to reach their full potential.
    • Promotion of Women’s Sports: Supporting women athletes at both grassroots and elite levels is crucial, as they constitute 50% of India’s population.
      • Specialised Women’s Only Leagues in football, basketball, and hockey have been introduced to ensure a level playing field.
    • Promotion of Divyang Athletes: The SAI National Centre of Excellence in Gandhinagar is dedicated to para-athletes. Support through the TOPS Scheme.
    • The scheme emphasises fitness programs for school children, promoting a healthy lifestyle from an early age.
    • It celebrates India’s rich heritage of rural and indigenous sports, ensuring their preservation and growth.

     

     

    [stextbox id=’info’]

    Sports Authority of India (SAI)

    • Administrative Control: Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports.
    • Established in 1984 by the Indian Government.
    • Successor organisation to the IXth Asian Games held in Delhi (1982).
    • It is registered under the Societies Act, of 1860.
    • Objective: To promote sports and games in India (as per Government Resolution).
    • Legislation: Governed by Memorandum of Association & Rules, and Financial ByeLaws.
    • Funds Allocation: Government grants are used to implement sports promotion schemes across India through regional centres and academic institutes.

    [/stextbox]

     

  • International Centre for Audit of Local Governance

    Context:

    Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India Girish Chandra Murmu inaugurated the International Centre for Audit of Local Governance (iCAL), a first in the country in Rajkot.

     

    About iCAL:

    • iCAL will be a collaborative platform for policymakers, administrators and auditors linked with local governments.
    • Primary aim is to empower auditors, executives, and elected representatives of local governments to effectively fulfil their roles through training and leadership development initiatives.
    • It will enhance the local government auditors’ independence to ensure improved financial performance assessment, service delivery, and data reporting.
    • iCAL will also act as a knowledge centre and thinktank for addressing governance issues at grassroot levels across nations through interactive workshops, knowledge sharing sessions, peer exchanges.

     

    Need for iCAL:

    • Aligned with Global practices as 40 countries have their respective Supreme Audit Institutions (SAI).
    • There must be institutionalised collaboration among SAIs and with international audit organisations to share best practices, exchange knowledge and experiences of glocal auditors.
    • To enhance collaboration among 2.5 lakh panchayats and 8,000 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), and exchange knowledge, promote best practices etc. 
    • Addressing Inefficiencies and Fund utilisation : Concerns have been raised about inefficiencies in local body financial management and reporting, as highlighted by the Reserve Bank of India’s 2022 report
    • iCAL aims to address these inefficiencies through better auditing practices and capacity building.
    • To navigate local government auditing complexities, there is a need to enhance auditors’ and local employees’ understanding of financial management and controls. 
    • Establishing open communication with local officials will streamline the audit process, improve data access, and boost cooperation on audit findings.

     

    Auditing  of local bodies in India at present :

    • State governments have an Examiner of Local Fund Accounts (ELFA) or Director of Local Fund Accounts (DLFA) for auditing local bodies accounts.
    • In Gujarat, for instance, the ELFA is an autonomous office functioning under the aegis of the finance department.
    • CAG also exercises control and supervision over the proper maintenance of accounts and auditing for all three levels of PRIs/ULBs
    • Under its technical guidance and support initiative, CAG also advises and supports ELFA or DLFA and thereby supplements the latter’s work.

     

     

    [stextbox id=’info’]

    Constitutional Provision 

    The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992,  added Parts IX (Eleventh Schedule)  and IX-A (Twelfth Schedule) which contained provisions on Local Governance. 

    • It is a State subject in List II of Seventh Schedule
    • Article 243J states that the Legislature of a State may, by law, make provisions with respect to maintenance of accounts by Panchayats and auditing of such accounts.

    [/stextbox]

     

  • Amended Surrogacy Leave Rules for Government Employees.

    Context:

    The Centre has notified amended rules to allow women government employees to take 180 days of maternity leave in case they have children through surrogacy.

     

    More on news:

    • Government has amended Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972.
    • Maternity leave of 180 days granted to surrogate or commissioning mothers if they are government servants and have less than two surviving children.
    • Commissioning fathers are eligible for 15 days of paternity leave within 6 months from child’s delivery, with less than two surviving children.
    • Existing rules allow a female government servant and single male government servant child care leave for a maximum period of 730 days during entire service “for taking care of two eldest surviving children
      • “Surrogate mother” is defined as a woman who bears a child on behalf of a commissioning mother.
      • “Commissioning father” is defined as the intended father of a child born through surrogacy.

     

    Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021:

    • Surrogacy codified in law to establish its status as a legitimate mode of reproduction.
    • Law defines who is genuinely eligible and excludes others deemed to be “misusing” surrogacy.
    • Prohibition of Commercial Surrogacy: Only altruistic surrogacy arrangements allowed, no monetary compensation for surrogates.
    • Gestational Surrogacy Only: Utilises Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) such as In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF).
    • Only married couples and ever-married single women (widowed or divorced) can seek surrogacy.
      • Numerous petitions contesting the exclusionary approach based on marital status.
    • Intending parents must produce a “certificate of essentiality” for medical justification.
    • Use of own gametes by intending parents is mandated.

    details about surrogacy,fertilisation(IVF)

    Amendment to Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022:

    • Gametes Requirement: Both gametes need not come from a married couple if certified as suffering from a medical condition.
    • Gamete Requirement for Intending Couple: At least one gamete must come from the intending couple.
    • Single Women (Widow or Divorcee): Must use self-eggs and donor sperm for surrogacy procedures.
      • Supreme Court Query: Supreme Court questioned if surrogacy by single women affects child legitimacy.
    • Amendment: Consent of the Surrogate Mother and Agreement for Surrogacy, read with Rule 7, amended on March 14, 2023.
    • Donor Eggs: Previously banned for gestational surrogacy of intending couples, now allowed if certified by the District Medical Board due to medical condition of either husband or wife.
  • Lok Adalat

    Context:

    In the 75th year of its establishment, the Supreme Court of India is organising a Special Lok Adalat from 29th July 2024 to 3rd August 2024 to facilitate amicable settlements of suitable pending cases.

     

    Lok Adalat: 

    • Lok Adalat means “People’s Court” and is based on Gandhian principles.
    • It is one of the alternative dispute redressal mechanisms
    • Lok adalats have statutory status under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
    • It is a forum where disputes/cases pending in the court of law or at pre-litigation stage civil and criminal are settled/ compromised amicably. 
    • Awards (decisions) by Lok Adalats are deemed as decrees of a civil court; they are final and binding on all parties. 
    • No appeal against such an award lies before any court of law.
    • There is no court fee payable when a matter is filed in a Lok Adalat.
    • Lok Adalats can be held at district, state, and national levels. 
      • State Legal Services Authorities and High Court Legal Services Committees exist in every state and high court. 
      • District and Taluk Legal Services Committees provide free legal services and conduct Lok Adalats. 
      • The Supreme Court Legal Services Committee oversees legal services related to the Supreme Court of India.
    • The persons deciding the cases in the Lok Adalats are called the Members of the Lok Adalats
      • Lok Adalat doesn’t make its own decisions on cases; instead, it resolves them based on the compromise or settlement agreed upon by the parties.
    • Every Lok Adalat shall consist of such number of serving or retired judicial officers and other persons of area as may be specified by agency organising. 
      • Generally, Lok Adalat comprises a judicial officer as the chairman, along with a lawyer and a social worker as members.

     

    Types of Lok Adalats: 

    • National Lok Adalats: 
      • They are held at regular intervals where on a single day lok adalats are held throughout the country, in all the courts. 
      • From 2015, they are held on specific subject matter every month. 
    • State Lok Adalats: 
      • They are also known as regular lok adalats. 
      • They can be further classified into: 
        • Continuous Lok Adalat, Daily Lok Adalat, Mobile Lok Adalat and Mega Lok Adalat. 
    • Permanent Lok Adalats: 
      • The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 was amended in 2002 to provide for Permanent Lok Adalats. 
      • They deal with cases related to public utility services (transport services of passengers or goods by air, road and water; postal, telegraph or telephone service, etc.

    [stextbox id=’info’]

    DO YOU KNOW?

    • The first Lok Adalat camp was organised in Gujarat in 1982 as a voluntary and conciliatory agency without any statutory backing for its decisions.
    • It promotes the constitutional mandate of Article 39-A of the India Constitution. 
    • Articles 14 and 22(1) of the Constitution also make it obligatory for the State to ensure equality before law and a legal system which promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity to all.

    [/stextbox]

     

     

  • Social Transfers cuts Consumption Gap

    Context:

    The survey by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation focuses on social transfers’ impact on the consumption gap between urban and rural households, highlighting improving living standards.

    More in News: 

    • The survey reveals social transfers, including state pensions and subsidies, narrowed the urban-rural consumption gap.
    • Social benefits positively impact food expenditure, particularly cereals, improving living standards.
    • Cuts in social transfers can widen the consumption gap, affecting purchasing power and exacerbating inequalities.

    What is Social Transfer? 

    • Social transfers refer to benefits the government or other organisations provide to address specific risks or needs, such as old age, sickness, or family support.
    • Examples include state pensions, disability benefits, child benefits, and job seekers’ benefits.

    Composition of Social Transfers:

    • Social transfers comprise both social benefits received by households and social contributions made by households.
    • Social benefits are direct payments or services provided to households to fulfil specific needs, while social contributions are payments into schemes that provide social benefits.
    • Types of Social Benefits: Social benefits can be in cash, such as pensions or child benefits, or in-kind, which include subsidised or free goods and services like healthcare and education.

    [stextbox id=’info’]

    Consumption Gap: 

    It refers to the disparity or difference in the level of consumption expenditure between different segments of the population, such as urban and rural households, indicating variations in living standards

    [/stextbox]

    Key Findings of the Survey: 

    • Impact of Social Transfers on Consumption Gap:
      • The survey indicates that social transfers have helped narrow the urban-rural gap in per capita monthly consumption expenditure.
      • When the imputed value of welfare schemes is considered, households, especially in rural areas, show an improvement in consumption expenditure, particularly on food.
      • Rural households saw a rise in monthly per capita consumption spending from ₹3,773 to ₹3,860, while urban households experienced an increase from ₹6,459 to ₹6,521.

     

    •  Effect on Food Consumption:
      • Social transfers have had a significant impact on food consumption, particularly on cereals and cereal substitutes.
      • Monthly per capita spending on cereals increased from ₹185 to ₹267 in rural households and from ₹235 to ₹294 in urban households after factoring in the value of benefits.

     

    • Overall Impact on Consumption:
      • For overall food consumption, the monthly per capita expenditure in rural areas increased from ₹1,750 to ₹1,832, and in urban areas, it rose from ₹2,530 to ₹2,589 after the inclusion of the value of benefits.

     

    • Impact of Social Transfers cuts:
      • Reductions in social transfers can widen the consumption gap between urban and rural households.
      • Cuts in social benefits may lead to decreased purchasing power among households, particularly affecting their ability to afford essential goods and services.
      • This can further exacerbate inequalities and disparities in living standards between different segments of the population.

  • Special Category Status for States

    Context:

    Telugu Desam Party (TDP) president N Chandrababu Naidu, after winning 16 Lok Sabha seats, has become crucial for the BJP’s 240-seat majority, likely leveraging support to secure Special Category State status for Andhra Pradesh.

    What is Special Category Status (SCS)?

    • In 1969, the Fifth Finance Commission of India introduced Special Category Status (SCS) to aid certain states in their development and accelerate growth if they faced historical economic or geographical disadvantages.
    • The system was discontinued based on the recommendation of the 14th Finance Commission, which proposed addressing states’ resource gaps by increasing the devolution of tax from 32% to 42%.

    Constitutional Basis:

    • Part XXI of the Indian Constitution: Titled “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions,” outlines special provisions for states.
    • Temporary Nature: Initially intended to be temporary, these provisions have persisted for decades, sparking ongoing debates and analyses.

    Objectives of Special Provisions:

    • Respect and Protection of Identity: Upholding the unique identity and rights of people in states with special provisions.
    • Promotion of Socio-economic Development: Bridging developmental gaps.
    • Ensuring Participation in National Mainstream: Fostering inclusivity.
    • Maintenance of Peace and Stability: Acknowledging and addressing unique regional challenges.
    • Strengthening National Unity and Integrity: Accommodating diversity within the constitutional framework.

    Criteria for SCS: 

    • Hilly Terrain: The state must have a significant portion of its area covered by hills and mountains.
    • Low Population Density and/or Sizeable Share of Tribal Population: The state must have a low population density and/or a significant proportion of its population consisting of tribals.
    • Strategic Location along Borders with Neighbouring Countries: The state must be located along international borders with neighbouring countries.
    • Economic and Infrastructure Backwardness: The state must be economically and infrastructurally backward.
    • Nonviable Nature of State Finances: The state must have non-viable finances, meaning it cannot sustain itself financially without assistance.

    Current Status: Currently, 11 states have been granted SCS, including Assam, Nagaland, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Uttarakhand, and Telangana.

    Benefits:

    • Central Assistance: The central government provides up to 90% of the funds for centrally sponsored schemes in the form of grants and 10% as loans.
    • Tax Concessions: The states receive concessions in customs and excise duties, income tax, and corporate tax.
    • Special Plan Assistance: The states receive special plan assistance for projects of importance to the state.
    • Unspent Funds: Unspent funds do not lapse at the end of the financial year.

    Recent Demands for SCS:

    • Bihar:
      • Criteria Met: Bihar argues it meets most of the SCS criteria, such as economic and infrastructural backwardness, despite lacking hilly terrain.
      • Reason for Demand: The state has been demanding SCS for years to address poverty and backwardness.
    • Andhra Pradesh:
      • TDP’s Demand: The Telugu Desam Party (TDP) has been demanding SCS since Andhra Pradesh’s bifurcation in 2014.
      • Promise Unfulfilled: TDP argues that Andhra Pradesh was promised SCS for five years as compensation for losing its revenue-rich capital Hyderabad.
      • Political Action: The TDP withdrew from the NDA alliance in 2018 citing “injustice” due to the denial of SCS.
    • Odisha:
      • Long-standing Demand: Odisha has been pushing for SCS for several years.
      • Criteria Met: The state argues it meets the criteria of economic and infrastructural backwardness and nonviable state finances.

    Issues Related to SCS:

    • Lack of Constitutional or Legal Basis: SCS is based on discretionary decisions by the National Development Council (NDC) or the central government.
    • Criteria Lack Uniformity or Transparency: Absence of clear criteria for granting SCS, leading to demands from other states.
    • Ambiguity in Duration or Review: Some states receive SCS temporarily, while others have it for decades.
    • Absence of Impact Assessment: No clear evidence showing that SCS has accelerated growth in beneficiary states.
    • Fiscal Discipline Concerns: Misuse or diversion of funds intended for specific purposes.

    Way Forward:

    • Reviewing Existing Provisions: Regular assessments to ensure alignment with evolving needs.
    • Transparency and Accountability: Clear communication and responsible implementation.
    • Finding Common Ground: Promoting collaboration between states and the Central government for a unified and fair India.
  • National Centre for Good Governance

    Context:

    A Building Programme on Project and Risk Management for Public Works for the officers from the Republic of Tanzania commenced recently at the National Centre for Good Governance (NCGG), Mussoorie.

     

    More on News:

    • NCGG’s efforts reflect the Indian philosophy of ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ emphasising enhancing bilateral ties and promoting cooperation with other nations.
    • The capacity-building program offers cross-country experiences and facilitates policy dialogue, emphasising best practices in project and risk management across sectors.

     

    [stextbox id=’info’]

    Good governance refers to the effective and responsible management of public affairs and resources by public institutions to meet the needs of the people. 

    Good governance is characterised by eight key principles: participation, rule of law, transparency, responsiveness, consensus-oriented decision-making, equity and inclusiveness, effectiveness and efficiency, and accountability

    The Hota Committee, established in 2005, recommended: 

    • Institutionalisation of Training
    • Competency-Based Training
    • Interdisciplinary Training
    • Use of Technology 
    • Continuous Evaluation and Feedback.

    [/stextbox]

     

    About NCGG:

    • The National Centre for Good Governance (NCGG) was set up in 2014. 
    • It is an apex–level autonomous institution under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. 
    • The Centre traces its origin to the National Institute of Administrative Research (NIAR), which was set up in 1995 by the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration (LBSNAA).
    • It is mandated to work in the areas of governance, policy reforms, capacity building and training of civil servants and technocrats of India and other developing countries. 
    • The Centre has focused on decentralised planning, capacity building of Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs), etc. 
    • It also addresses good governance, social accountability, and issues in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), among others.
    • It also works as a think tank.
  • The Dilemma of Governance: Technology vs Human Connection 

    Context

    The recent news highlighted a discussion on the pitfalls of over-reliance on technology in governance and the need to prioritise human interaction.

     

    More on News

    Negative Impact of Consumerism and Advertising

    • Advertising often exploits human insecurities to drive consumption, fostering consumerism, and undermining genuine human connections.
    • This perpetuates a belief that technology can replace meaningful human interactions.
    • Example: Plastic was identified in 93% of the samples, which included major name brands such as Aqua, Aquafina, Dasani, Evian, Nestle Pure Life and Bisleri.

    Concerns about Technological Solutions in Governance

    • The increasing reliance on technological solutions raises questions about their ability to substitute for human and societal connections in governance.
    • There’s uncertainty about whether these solutions truly address needs or contribute to a culture of inadequacy.
    • Example: Jam Trinity, an abbreviation for Jan Dhan Yojna, Aadhaar and Mobile  has raised significant concerns about privacy and data security due to the sharing of personal data, including biometrics, across multiple platforms.

     

    Importance of Human Interaction

    • Over-reliance on technology overlooks critical human-society interaction, leading to deficiencies in last-mile service delivery.
    • While technology can streamline governance processes, the neglect of long-term policy interventions and anthropocene challenges may worsen societal issues.
    • Example: Values like Empathy, ethical decision making, equity, etc. enhance human interaction by fostering trust, understanding, and cooperation among individuals. 

     

    [stextbox id=’info’]

    Anthropocene Challenges:

    It refers to the environmental problems caused by human activity.

    Some of them are:

    • Extreme climatic conditions
    • Natural resource contamination, 
    • E-waste proliferation, 
    • Biodiversity loss, 
    • Deforestation, 
    • Ocean acidification, 
    • Air pollution, 
    • Urbanisation pressures.

    [/stextbox]

     

    Anthropocene

    • Anthropocene highlights the prominent role of human activities in shaping the Earth’s current state.
    • It’s characterised by widespread changes in the environment, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, and alterations to the Earth’s land surface.

     

    Technology cannot replace humans in governance

    Unforeseen Circumstances:

    • Humans can adapt and find creative solutions in unpredictable situations, while technology may encounter limitations or breakdowns.
    • Example: Humans possess intimate knowledge of disaster-affected areas, including geographical, cultural, and social context during any unforeseen disaster.

    Ethical Decision-Making:

    • Humans possess moral judgement crucial for navigating complex situations in last-mile delivery, a quality lacking in technology.
    • Example: Environmental degradation often disproportionately affects marginalised communities. So a moral judgement would excel over technological solutions.

    Sustainable development and intergenerational equity:

    • It requires holistic decision-making that considers long-term impacts on the environment, society, and economy. 
    • Example: Chaukhambha Model introduced by Ram Manohar Lohia refers to a development model that emphasises balanced regional development.

    Complexity of Human Interaction:

    • Last-mile delivery requires understanding local contexts, addressing individual needs, and building trust, which technology struggles to replicate.
    • Example: SDG localization addresses the unique social, economic, and cultural contexts of different communities. 

     

    Conclusion

    • In conclusion, while technology can enhance governance processes, it cannot entirely replace humans. 
    • Therefore, a balanced approach that leverages technology while recognizing the irreplaceable role of human judgement, intuition, and empathy is necessary for effective governance.