Font size:
Print
India’s E-Waste Challenge and the Path to Sustainable Progress
India’s rising e-waste, the need to recast its management
Context: India’s digital transformation, pivotal to the vision of Viksit Bharat, is underpinned by widespread adoption of electronic devices — from smartphones to industrial and medical equipment. While this technological surge boosts economic growth and connectivity, it brings with it a growing by-product: electronic waste (e-waste).
The Alarming Rise of E-Waste in India
- India now ranks among the top global e-waste generators, alongside China, the United States, Japan, and Germany.
- The statistics highlight a stark reality: India’s e-waste volume has surged by 151.03% in just six years, rising from 7,08,445 metric tonnes in 2017-18 to 17,78,400 metric tonnes in 2023-24.
- This represents an average annual increase of 1,69,283 metric tonnes.
- The rapid expansion of electronic usage demands equally robust mechanisms to manage the by-products of technological growth.
The Role of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
-
- To address the e-waste crisis, the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework has been introduced. EPR mandates that producers, importers, and brand owners take responsibility for managing the waste generated from their products at the end of their life cycles.
- This approach holds stakeholders accountable for environmental impacts across the product’s entire life span. It encourages:
- Sustainable product design,
- Integration of environmental costs into product pricing,
- Investment in efficient waste management systems.
- EPR shifts the burden away from municipal bodies and onto the entities that profit from electronic production and consumption.
Consequences of Improper E-Waste Management
- The losses incurred by India due to improper e-waste management are both economic and humanitarian:
- Environmental Losses: Over $10 billion lost annually due to:
- Water pollution (from cyanide and sulphuric acid).
- Air pollution (from lead fumes, coal burning, plastic incineration).
- Soil contamination from toxic waste disposal.
- Social and Economic Impacts:
- A social loss exceeding $20 billion annually due to:
- Hazardous recycling practices by informal, illegal recyclers, often women and children.
- The average lifespan of such workers is less than 27 years.
- India forfeits over ₹80,000 crore annually in lost critical metal value due to primitive extraction methods.
- The government loses $20 billion annually in tax revenue as informal recycling remains cash-based and unregulated.
- A social loss exceeding $20 billion annually due to:
The Importance of a Floor Price in EPR Certificates
- The E-waste (Management) Rules, 2022 introduced a crucial reform: a floor price for EPR certificates. This game-changer ensures India transitions from hazardous informal recycling to a formal, regulated system.
- A floor price:
- Ensures fair compensation for registered recyclers, making recycling economically viable.
- Discourages informal, unsafe practices, which still account for 95% of e-waste processing in India.
- It incentivises formal recyclers to adopt safe, technologically advanced methods for recovering valuable materials like gold, copper, and rare earth elements.
- This prevents the kind of instability seen in the plastic waste sector, where low prices led to market collapse and proliferation of sham recyclers.
Why Stable Pricing Matters?
- Beyond economic reasons, a floor price has wide-reaching environmental and societal benefits:
- Motivates recyclers to prioritise material recovery over disposal.
- Reduces toxic leaching into landfills, soil, and water bodies.
- Transforms e-waste from a liability into a valuable resource, fostering a circular economy.
- Aligns India with global best practices, where EPR fees paid by OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) are much higher than India’s current floor prices.
- Enables predictability and builds trust in the EPR market by avoiding sudden price collapses.
- This stable pricing environment empowers recyclers to:
- Expand operations,
- Deliver verifiable, traceable outcomes,
- Help producers meet EPR compliance without corner-cutting.
- Given that only 10% of India’s e-waste currently reaches formal recycling channels, the stability offered by floor pricing could be transformational.
Addressing Concerns About Producer Costs
- Critics of the floor price argue that it may increase costs for producers and ultimately raise prices for consumers. While this concern is understandable, it overlooks the broader implications:
- The cost of inaction—environmental devastation, public health crises, and resource depletion—is far greater than the minimal additional costs from fair recycling pricing.
- Producers can mitigate costs through innovation, creating:
- Durable and longer-lasting products,
- Easily recyclable components,
- Environmentally friendly designs — core goals of the EPR framework.
- The plastic waste sector’s missteps with underpricing and fake recyclers should serve as a cautionary tale. Rather than stifle growth, a floor price rewards innovation and efficiency, making sustainable practices the norm.
A Vision for India’s Recycling Future
- The implications of floor pricing go beyond finances. Without it, the risks include:
- Pollution of rivers, soils, and crops,
- Exposure of vulnerable communities to toxic chemicals,
- Continued squandering of valuable resources and economic opportunity.
- But with it, India can:
- Formalise its vast e-waste ecosystem,
- Promote technological investment and recycling infrastructure,
- Lead the world in sustainable resource efficiency.
- The numbers speak clearly: a 73% increase in e-waste over five years is a resounding call for urgent, bold action.
