Caste Census: A Powerful Step Towards Inclusive and Just Governance

  • 0
  • 3130
Font size: 18px14px
Print

Caste Census: A Powerful Step Towards Inclusive and Just Governance

Caste Census: Empowering Social Justice with Real Numbers

Context:

The Government of India’s decision to include caste enumeration in the upcoming Census marks a bold, transformative, and commendable policy shift. Caste enumeration is not identity politics, but a necessary mirror to the lived realities of millions. It is a critical step toward evidence-based policymaking, and essential for social justice, equity-driven development, and inclusive governance.

Post-Independence Paradox: Caste Blindness vs. Social Justice

  • India has historically followed a dual and conflicting approach—abolishing caste hierarchies while simultaneously pursuing caste-based affirmative action.
  • The refusal to count caste in the Census was aligned with a policy of caste blindness, which contradicts constitutional mandates of social justice.
  • The Constitution of India supports affirmative action through reservations in education, employment, and political representation.
  • While the Constitution uses the term “class”, the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld caste as a valid proxy for identifying social and educational backwardness.

 

Importance of Caste Data: Constitutional, Legal and Administrative Grounds

  • Since 1951, the Census has only included SCs and STs, excluding OBCs and upper castes, despite constitutional eligibility for reservations.
  • The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments mandate OBC reservations in Panchayati Raj institutions and urban local bodies, making OBC data collection an administrative necessity.
  • The introduction of EWS reservations in 2019 for upper castes further reinforces the need for a comprehensive caste count.
  • Current reservation policy operates in an evidence vacuum, leading to elite capture, inequitable benefit distribution, and policy arbitrariness.

The Urgent Need for Caste Enumeration

  • Caste data is essential not only for reservation implementation, but also for:
    • Equity-driven planning
    • Targeted policymaking
    • Monitoring social disparities over time
  • The absence of disaggregated caste data has allowed dominant castes to consolidate control over wealth, opportunity, and power.
  • According to data submitted to Justice G. Rohini Commission:
    • 10 OBC castes cornered 25% of OBC quota benefits.
    • 38% of OBC castes received only 3% of the benefits.
    • 37% received no benefits at all.
  • Thus, caste enumeration is essential to enable:
    • Rational sub-categorisation
    • Definition of the “creamy layer”
    • Equitable policy design

Learning from the SECC-2011 Failure

  • The Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) 2011 was a major policy failure due to:
    • Lack of legal authority (not under the Census Act, 1948)
    • Poor institutional choice (Ministries of Rural and Urban Development led the process)
    • Open-ended and ambiguous questions
    • Inadequate training and classification
  • Result: An unusable data set claiming the existence of 46 lakh castes, leading to policy paralysis.

Learning from Bihar’s Success: A Model for Replication

  • The Bihar Caste Survey stands as an example of methodical planning and successful execution:
    • Pre-validated list of 214 castes with a general “Other Castes” category.
    • Accurate, state-specific enumeration through trained officials.
    • Shows that a credible and feasible caste survey is entirely possible.

Blueprint for a Robust and Credible Caste Census

  • Legal Backing
    • Amend the Census Act, 1948 to explicitly mandate caste enumeration.
    • Legally insulate the process from political interference.
  • Entrusting the Right Institution: Delegate responsibility solely to the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, not to ministries without domain expertise.
  • Standardised Questionnaire Design
    • Use closed-ended questions with:
      • Sub-caste
      • Broader caste group
      • Aliases
      • Optional surname field
    • Implement unique digital codes to standardise data and avoid duplication (e.g., “Iyer” and “Aiyar” as one group).
  • Preparation of State-specific Caste Lists
    • Collaborate with State governments, sociologists, and community leaders.
    • Invite public feedback before finalisation of caste lists.
  • Enumerator Training
    • Conduct region-specific training modules with:
      • Mock examples
      • Clear do’s and don’ts
      • Local caste knowledge
  • Digital Tools for Accuracy
    • Equip enumerators with handheld digital devices.
    • Preload devices with validated caste lists.
    • Restrict input to predefined categories to avoid manual errors.

Beyond the Decadal Census: Need for Continuous Caste Data Collection

  • Caste data collection should not be restricted to the Census alone.
  • Periodic surveys by NSSO, NFHS, and other agencies must also include SCs, STs, OBCs, and upper castes.
  • The era of partial counting and statistical invisibility must come to an end.

 

  • Representative and Neutral Staffing
    • Ensure diverse community representation among enumerators.
    • Avoid conflict of interest by deploying them outside their native areas.
  • Independent Oversight Mechanisms
    • Form district-level audit committees to:
      • Monitor data collection
      • Conduct random sample checks for integrity
  • Pilot Testing Across States: Conduct pilot studies in socially and regionally diverse States such as: Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh & Assam. 
Share:
Print
Apply What You've Learned.
Songar Drones
Previous Post Songar Drones
Next Post Small Savings Schemes: A Powerful Tool for Financial Security in India
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x