Font size:
Print
Building Peace in India’s Red Corridor
Context: The development of infrastructure, particularly roads, in regions historically plagued by the Maoist (Naxalite) insurgency, is a strategic imperative that goes beyond mere connectivity.
What is the Red Corridor?
- The Red Corridor is a term used to describe the region in eastern, central, and southern India that experiences significant Naxalite-Maoist insurgency.
- It is a compact revolutionary zone stretching from the borders of Nepal to parts of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, encompassing dense forests and tribal-dominated districts in states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Bihar, West Bengal, and Maharashtra.
What are the primary reasons that give rise to insurgencies in these areas?
- Historical Marginalisation and Neglect: Tribal communities in these areas have historically faced systemic neglect, economic exploitation (especially of forest resources), and social alienation. Thus, their primary call is for Jal, Jangal aur Zameen.
- Governance Deficit: The near-total absence of formal state institutions—such as schools, hospitals, courts, and police stations—created a vacuum. The state was often seen only as an extractive or oppressive entity, causing disaffection.
- Displacement and Land Alienation: Development projects like mining dams and industries have often led to displacement of tribal populations without adequate rehabilitation, fueling resentment.
- Lack of Economic Opportunities: Poverty, unemployment, and a lack of livelihood options make the youth vulnerable to recruitment by Maoist groups.
- Ideological Exploitation: Maoist ideology capitalises on these grievances, positioning itself as the champion of the poor and the adversary of the state and exploitative capitalists.
In what ways does improved connectivity contribute to reducing alienation in these areas?
- Enables State Presence: Roads are the physical precondition for the arrival of governance. They allow police, administration, teachers, and doctors to reach remote villages, making the state a tangible reality.
- Enhances Access to Services: It facilitates access to education, healthcare, markets, and government welfare schemes, directly improving the quality of life and giving citizens a stake in the system.
- Boosts Economic Opportunities: Connectivity links villages to markets, allowing tribals to get better prices for their produce and access to employment, reducing economic desperation.
- Undermines Insurgent Control: Roads break the isolation that insurgents rely on for sanctuary, mobility, and imposing their own extralegal systems. It becomes harder for them to enforce blockades or dominate areas when state forces can respond faster.
- Symbolic Value: A road symbolizes the state’s commitment and its promise to stay, building legitimacy and countering the narrative of neglect propagated by insurgents.
What challenges do governments face when implementing infrastructure projects in insurgency-prone areas?
- Security Threats: Construction sites and workers are soft targets for insurgent attacks. Maoists frequently sabotage road-building equipment and threaten or attack contractors and laborers to stall projects.
- Difficult Terrain: The projects are located in dense forests, hilly areas, and remote locations with extreme climatic conditions, making logistics and engineering complex and costly.
- Lack of Local Contractor Participation: Due to fear of reprisals from Naxalites, local contractors are often reluctant to take up projects, delaying implementation.
- Community Mistrust: Decades of neglect and violence have bred deep mistrust among local communities. Without their buy-in, projects are seen as symbols of state control for counter-insurgency rather than development for inclusion.
- Need for Holistic Approach: Building a road alone is insufficient. Without accompanying institutions (schools, clinics) and safeguards (justice mechanisms, community consultation), it can become a tool for repression rather than empowerment.
What other measures have been taken by the Government to achieve a Naxal-free India by 2026?
- Security Fortification (SAMADHAN Doctrine)
- Surrender and Rehabilitation Policy: Incentivising Maoists to surrender with financial assistance, vocational training, and housing to facilitate their reintegration into mainstream society.
- Development and Welfare Schemes: Actively implementing schemes like Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (housing), PM Ujjwala Yojana (LPG connections), and MGNREGA (employment guarantee) in these regions to address developmental gaps and win hearts and minds.
- Technology Deployment: Using drones, satellite imagery, and UAVs for surveillance and intelligence gathering to track insurgent movements in difficult terrains.
- Large-Scale Coordinated Operations: Conducting major inter-state and inter-force operations to target senior Maoist leadership and destroy their infrastructure. Example: Operation Black Forest (joint force of CRPF, CoBRA, DRG, and state police), Greyhound Force, etc.
