Font size:
Print
Ennore’s Ecological Crisis and the Global Ocean Funding Gap
UN Ocean Conference sees limited progress
Context: Ennore in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, is now at the heart of a deepening ecological crisis. It was a natural barrier against storms and erosion, today, the loss of these ecosystems reflects broader global failures to fund and prioritise ocean and coastal protection.
More on News
- Meanwhile, at the 2025 United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC-3) in Nice, France, representatives from 175 nations gathered to discuss funding for Sustainable Development Goal 14 (SDG 14), which aims to conserve and sustainably use marine resources by 2030.
- However, SDG 14 remains the least funded among all SDGs, raising concerns about global commitments to ocean protection.
Ennore’s Ecological Decline
- Ennore, a coastal neighbourhood in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, is bordered by the Kosasthalaiyar River and the Bay of Bengal. Historically protected by mangroves and wetlands, which have now been severely degraded.
- Shrinking Wetlands and Mangroves:
- A 2022 report submitted to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) revealed that Ennore’s wetlands and mangroves have shrunk from 889 hectares (2016) to just 278 hectares (2022)—a 70% loss.
-
- The National Centre for Coastal Research (NCCR) documented that 350 hectares of coastline north of Chennai port, including Ennore, have already been lost to sea erosion.
- Government Response: Supriya Sahu, Additional Chief Secretary (Environment, Climate Change, and Forests), Tamil Nadu, stated that the state is preparing a restoration plan, including mangrove revival. World Bank funding has been secured for coastal biodiversity enhancement in Ennore and other regions.
Global Funding Crisis for Ocean Conservation
- SDG 14: The Least Funded Goal: SDG 14 focuses on marine conservation, pollution reduction, and sustainable fisheries, but remains severely underfunded.
-
-
- According to the Sustainable Development Report 2024, no country has achieved SDG 14, and India faces major challenges in meeting its targets.
- Annual funding requirement: $175 billion by 2030, but only $10 billion was invested between 2015-2019 (World Economic Forum).
-
- 30×30 Biodiversity Target Underfunded: The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to protect 30% of land and marine areas by 2030 (30×30 target). However, there is a $14.6 billion annual shortfall in funding for this goal (Ocean Protection Gap report).
UN Ocean Conference 2025 (UNOC 3)
- Voluntary Commitments: The EU pledged $1.14 billion for ocean health and coastal communities. Philanthropists and investors committed $10 billion over five years for the blue economy. However, experts like Fabienne McLellan (OceanCare) argue that these are mostly pre-existing funds and insufficient.
- Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) Funding Gap: Brian O’Donnell (Campaign for Nature) expressed disappointment over the lack of dedicated funding for MPAs, crucial for the 30×30 target.
Innovative Financing Mechanisms:
- One Ocean Finance Facility: A blended finance tool to unlock funding from shipping, tourism, and marine industries. Expected to launch in 2028, but scepticism remains over its timely impact.
- Blue Bonds: Debt instruments for ocean-friendly projects, but concerns persist over debt crises in developing nations.
- Debt-for-Nature Swaps: Allows countries to convert foreign debt into conservation funding, but risks foreign oversight.
- Parametric Insurance: Provides automatic payouts for climate disasters, but requires reliable data, which is often lacking.
- Global Fund for Coral Reefs (GFCR): Aims to mobilise $500 million, but has only secured $87.47 million so far. International Maritime Organisation’s Net-Zero Framework. Introduces a carbon pricing mechanism for shipping emissions from 2028, expected to generate $10 billion annually for developing nations.
Challenges in Bridging the Funding Gap
- Declining International Aid: Official Development Assistance (ODA) fell by 7.1% in 2024, the first drop in five years (OECD). The US and UK are reducing aid budgets, diverting funds to defence spending.
- Private Sector Limitations: McLellan warns that traditional investment models prioritise profits over sustainability, risking financial colonialism. O’Donnell argues that governments cannot rely solely on private funding to meet conservation goals.
